English 
Français 
Español 
A technical and operational comparison of the best no-code tools to use in 2025, with selection criteria, use cases, and practical integrations to accelerate the design of web and mobile applications.
Why choose no-code tools in 2025
The no-code movement is emerging as a key strategy for any or organization looking to reduce time to market.
Digital transformation is combined with platforms that allow the prototyping, testing and production of digital services without systematically going through a dedicated development team.
The trajectory since 2020 has shown two trends: the democratization of access to tools and the integration of AI to accelerate design. These elements reinforce the relevance of no-code in 2025.
Concrete use case: the fictitious company NovaTech, a B2B services SME, converted its portail client in 8 weeks thanks to a no-code chain combining Airtable for data management, Webflow for the front-end and Make for automations.
This approach allowed the product to be tested on a sample of customers without heavy development investment. NovaTech iterated on usability and business flows in a few days rather than several development sprints.
Practical benefits of no-code for businesses
The main benefit is the reduction of time-to-market via rapid feedback loops.
Product teams can validate hypotheses, collect metrics, and adjust interfaces without relying on a development backlog. This reduces initial financial risk.
- Rapid validation of ideas
- Reduced start-up costs
- Ease of integrating external APIs (e.g. Stripe, OpenAI)
- Enable non-technical teams to drive products
| Criteria | Profit | Impact on project |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid prototyping | Frequent iterations | Reduction of product risk |
| API Integration | Native connectivity | Automation of workflows |
| Initial cost | Subscriptions vs. Development | Better allocation of resources |
Points of vigilance: security, data governance and supplier lock-in require informed technical choices.
Using open-source or self-hosted solutions for sensitive workflows, as well as using standard APIs, mitigates these risks.
- Assess GDPR compliance and data localization.
- Provide a data export plan in the event of a change of supplier.
- Choose tools with strong authentication capabilities.
| Risk | Measurement | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Lockdown | Ensure exportability | Use Xano or export API |
| Privacy | Hosting and encryption | Self-host n8n or Xano |
| Scalability | Load testing | Plan scaling on Xano |
Insight: No-code has become a strategic lever for rapid experimentation, but its adoption requires technical governance and a thoughtful integration strategy.
No-code tools for building web and mobile apps
The selection of platforms depends on the functional scope: marketing site, webapp, native mobile application or internal MVP.
Solutions such as Webflow, Bubble, Adalo, Glide, and Thunkable address distinct needs, with tradeoffs between design freedom, business logic, and code exposure.
Webflow excels at front-end design and performance projects. Designers can create advanced interactions and manage an integrated CMS for content-rich sites.
Bubble, on the other hand, allows you to create webapps with complex business logic and workflows, often chosen for MVPs requiring a quickly functional user base.
Functional comparison: Webflow, Bubble, Adalo, Glide, Thunkable
Each solution addresses a specific need: Webflow for the responsive front, Bubble for business logic, Adalo and Thunkable for the mobile applications, Glide to transformer spreadsheets into operational app.
- Webflow: Pixel-perfect design and powerful CMS.
- Bubble: backend logic and complex workflows.
- Adalo: Build native mobile apps without code.
- Glide: Quickly convert Google Sheets into a usable app.
- Thunkable: Create cross-platform mobile apps with native components.
| Tool | Main use | Highlights | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webflow | Marketing website & CMS | Design, animations, hosting performant | Limited backend |
| Bubble | Custom webapp | Work complex flows, internal database | Learning curve |
| Adalo | Mobile application | Native components, stores publication | Performance sensitivity for heavy apps |
| Glide | Spreadsheet-based apps | Speed, simplicity | Limits for complex business logic |
| Thunkable | Cross-platform mobile apps | Native component access | Less orienté productivity backend |
Practical example: An e-learning startup combined Bubble for registration logic, Webflow for marketing, and Xano as the backend to manage the API and scaling.
This modular architecture reduces lock-in: each brick can be replaced if necessary.
- Choose Webflow for public pages and SEO.
- Choose Bubble for user workflows and business logic.
- Use Adalo/Thunkable for dedicated mobile versions.
- Use Glide for prototypes based on spreadsheet data.
| Scenario | Recommended stack | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| SaaS MVP | Bubble + Airtable + Stripe | Working prototype in weeks |
| Institutional site | Webflow + CMS | Performance SEO and design |
| Internal app | Adalo/Thunkable + Xano | Publication on stores and backend integration |
Insight: The judicious combination of no-code front-end and back-end platforms reduces technical risks and optimizes operational costs.
Automation, backend and data management
Automation and backends are the core of modern no-code systems.
Tools like Make, Zapier, n8n, Airtable, and Xano allow you to build data pipelines, APIs, and automated agents to manage all services.
Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier remain leading solutions for connecting services and automating recurring tasks.
Make offers a more visual and granular interface, while Zapier prioritizes simplicity and a large library of integrations.
n8n, Xano and Airtable: architecture for data
n8n stands out for its open-source approach and the possibility of self-hosting, offering greater control over sensitive data.
Xano provides a scalable no-code backend, focused on building APIs and managing business logic in front-end platforms.
- Make: Detailed visual scenarios and API chaining.
- Zapier: Fast integration between popular SaaS.
- n8n: open-source flexibility for private architectures.
- Xano: Scalable backend for APIs and complex logic.
- Airtable: collaborative database and multiple views.
| Tool | Role | Ideal for |
|---|---|---|
| Make | Advanced Automation | Work complex flows with transformations |
| Zapier | Simple automation | Fast connections between SaaS |
| n8n | Open-source automation | Sensitive data and self-hosting |
| Xano | Backend/API | Scalability and business logic |
| Airtable | Data management | Collaborative tables and views |
Case study: NovaTech used Make to sync Webflow formulaires with Airtable, triggering billing workflows via Stripe and notifications to Slack.
This orchestration made it possible to automate 70 % of manual tasks related to orders and to improve the responsiveness of customer service.
- Create test scenarios for each automation.
- Set up logs and alerts for errors.
- Provide recovery mechanisms for critical operations.
| Issue | No-code solution | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Data silos | Centralize via Airtable + Xano | Unified access and standard API |
| Repetitive tasks | Automate with Make or Zapier | Productivity gain |
| Accomplice | Self-host n8n and encrypt data | Better GDPR control |
Insight: Investing in an automation layer and a robust backend helps ensure the reliability and scalability of no-code solutions, while controlling operational costs.
Plateformes for interfaces, portails and internal products
The orientés interface and internal products facilitate the creation of customer portails, HR tools, CRM or operational dashboards.
Softr, Glide, Notion, Airtable, and Bubble are often combined to meet these needs, each serving a specific purpose.
Softr is like Lego blocks: it transforme data (Airtable, Google Sheets, Notion) into portails and front-end applications without recoding.
Glide excels at quick applications from Google Sheets and is ideal for directories, internal tools, and team empowerment MVPs.
Notion and Airtable: From Structured Content to Product
Notion remains a powerful tool for documenting processes, creating knowledge bases and managing lightweight workflows.
Airtable serves as a flexible data layer with multiple views useful to product and operations teams.
- Softr: Quickly create customer portails from Airtable.
- Glide: Convert Sheets to a mobile app in minutes.
- Concept: documentation, knowledge base, product prototypes.
- Airtable: collaborative relational database, integrable with Make.
- Bubble: extension if advanced business logic required on the interface side.
| Use cases | Recommended tools | Implementation time |
|---|---|---|
| Portail simple client | Softr + Airtable | 2-4 weeks |
| Internal directory | Glide + Google Sheets | 1-2 weeks |
| Product documentation | Notion | A few days |
| Custom CRM | Airtable + Make | 4-6 weeks |
Example: An internal marketing agency built a portail client with Softr connected to Airtable, automating rapports and deliverable sharing via Make. The project reduced email exchanges and centralized digital assets.
The modularity of this architecture also made it possible to add a layer of analytics via Xano without impacting the front end.
- Fav1TP4Use reusable blocks to speed up deployments.
- Document data mappings between Airtable/Notion and the front-end layer.
- Schedule checkpoints to validate conformity and UX with end users.
| Indicator | Target metric | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| User adoption | > 60 % in 30 days | Fast ROI |
| Email reduction | -40 % in 2 months | Save team time |
| Automation | 70 % repetitive tasks | Operational efficiency |
Insight: For internal products, the Softr/Airtable/Make or Glide/Sheets combination allows you to deliver value quickly while maintaining a clear path to technical scale-up if necessary.
Selection criteria, costs, security and integration
The selection of a no-code tool must be based on several technical and financial criteria: scalability, exporability, performance, recurring costs and conormity.
Vendors like Webflow, Airtable, Make, Softr, and Xano offer different pricing models, and it's essential to anticipate changing needs to avoid budget surprises.
Technical evaluation grid
Evaluating each solution based on objective criteria makes the decision easier. For NovaTech, the checklist included: API capacity, data export, SLA, scalability, and self-hosting options.
The choice led to a hybrid architecture guaranteeing performance and security while minimizing the initial cost.
- Ability to export documented data and APIs.
- Authentication options and GDPR conformity.
- Costs per user and operating costs (e.g. API calls).
- Self-hosting capability for sensitive workflows (n8n, Xano).
- Availability of a community and an ecosystem of extensions.
| Criteria | Question to ask | Minimum threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Scalability | Can it handle 10k active users? | Yes or clear development plan |
| Interoperability | Does Exporte data via REST/GraphQL API? | Yes |
| Security | Does Supporte SSO and encryption at rest? | Yes |
Costs: Comparing subscription models (per user, per transaction, per API volume) is essential. For example, Make charges per transaction, Xano offers tiers based on backend power, while Webflow is based on site/enterprise plans.
To control costs, it is advisable to estimate the volume of operations, storage needs and monthly API calls before committing to a long-term plan.
- Simulate the monthly bill based on forecast usage.
- Allow for peak usage and growth.
- Compare total cost of ownership vs traditional development.
| Tool | Pricing model | Board |
|---|---|---|
| Make | By operations | Estimate intensive workflows before purchase |
| Xano | By backend resources | Choose a plan adapted to the API load |
| Webflow | By site / company | Favor CMS plan for rich site |
| Airtable | By user | Anticipate collaborative use |
Ecosystem integration: Zapier, Make, and n8n facilitate connections to tools like Notion, Airtable, Stripe, or proprietary webhooks. Consider access governance and API key rotation.
Documenting flows and automations helps maintain operational continuity as teams change.
- Maintain a reference architecture file (Concept or technical documentation).
- Automate testing of critical workflows.
- Have a migration plan in place if a tool becomes obsolete.
| Risk | Mitigation | Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier lock-in | Modular architecture and regular exports | Product Team |
| API Dependency | Automatic tests and fallback | DevOps Team |
| Unforeseen expenses | Buffer budget and monitor cost | Finance / Product |
Insight: Implementing technical and financial governance from the selection phase allows you to get the most out of no-code without suffering its operational limitations.
DualMedia, web agency and mobile, supports the definition of hybrid no-code architectures and the implementation of stacks (Webflow, Airtable, Make, Xano) to guarantee performance, security and scalability. For technical recommendations or an architecture audit, consult the resources and services offered by DualMedia on their agency page, or discover the fundamentals of no-code on their guide.
To further explore the AI and no-code integration strategy, DualMedia has studies and feedback available on their AI and development file, and offers practical comparisons such as WordPress vs Wix or technical guides on front-end development.
For create an application mobile in guided steps, consult the DualMedia practical guide on how to create a mobile app and the selection of recommended no-code tools on their 2025 comparison.
Our team of development and design experts is ready to transformer your ideas into reality. Contact us today for a quick and accurate estimate.